- » ToastedRav.com
- » 106.5 The Arch
- » Article
The Newest Videos:
|
|
|
| Public Disservice Announcement: Screw Holiday Shopping, Give Cash! | Emily Riesen - 'My Heart's in St. Louis' | The Toast - 11.28.08 - Tila Tequila Out, Ikki Twins In And An Interview With Vince Vaughn |
Updated 153 Days ago
Sting Gets Stung By Environmentalists....
Sting has spoken out in the past on environmental issues, now this story from Starpulse.com that will have you thinking Mr. Sumner may be a bit of a hypocrite. It will be interesting to hear his response to this story......
Outrage Over Sting's Private Jet
British singer Sting has been slammed by environmental groups for hiring a private jet when he was the only passenger.
The Police frontman is a longtime campaigner for green issues and has regularly called on the public to cut back on their carbon emissions to help save the planet. However Sting - real name Gordon Sumner - has been accused of failing to heed his own message by chartering a jet for his own private use.
The star flew between Germany and London this weekend but although the plane had space for 14 other passengers, Sumner still traveled separately to the rest of his band. A spokesman for Leipzig airport, where the singer disembarked, confirmed the reports, stating that "Sting was the only passenger on board the Falcon 2000 aircraft."
The star's wife, Trudie Styler, was recently forced to come to her husband's defense over his environmentally unfriendly antics - insisting it is "difficult" for a musician to work without creating a huge carbon footprint.
About The Author:
Set your mood rings on blue people…. and join me every weekday afternoon at 4:20. That’s when I break one off from the home stash and fire up “The Archive” only on 1065….The Arch!
© Copyright 2008 ToastedRav.com and Bonneville International
An Equal Opportunity Employer all rights reserved
What is reCAPTCHA?
reCAPTCHA is a free CAPTCHA service that helps to digitize books.A CAPTCHA is a program that can tell whether its user is a human or a computer. You've probably seen them Ń colorful images with distorted text at the bottom of Web registration forms. CAPTCHAs are used by many websites to prevent abuse from "bots," or automated programs usually written to generate spam. No computer program can read distorted text as well as humans can, so bots cannot navigate sites protected by CAPTCHAs.
About 60 million CAPTCHAs are solved by humans around the world every day. In each case, roughly ten seconds of human time are being spent. Individually, that's not a lot of time, but in aggregate these little puzzles consume more than 150,000 hours of work each day. What if we could make positive use of this human effort? reCAPTCHA does exactly that by channeling the effort spent solving CAPTCHAs online into "reading" books.
To archive human knowledge and to make information more accessible to the world, multiple projects are currently digitizing physical books that were written before the computer age. The book pages are being photographically scanned, and then transformed into text using "Optical Character Recognition" (OCR). The transformation into text is useful because scanning a book produces images, which are difficult to store on small devices, expensive to download, and cannot be searched. The problem is that OCR is not perfect.
reCAPTCHA improves the process of digitizing books by sending words that cannot be read by computers to the Web in the form of CAPTCHAs for humans to decipher. More specifically, each word that cannot be read correctly by OCR is placed on an image and used as a CAPTCHA. This is possible because most OCR programs alert you when a word cannot be read correctly.
But if a computer can't read such a CAPTCHA, how does the system know the correct answer to the puzzle? Here's how: Each new word that cannot be read correctly by OCR is given to a user in conjunction with another word for which the answer is already known. The user is then asked to read both words. If they solve the one for which the answer is known, the system assumes their answer is correct for the new one. The system then gives the new image to a number of other people to determine, with higher confidence, whether the original answer was correct.
Currently, we are helping to digitize books from the Internet Archive and old editions of the New York Times.