This archived news story is available only for your personal, non-commercial use. Information in the story may be outdated or superseded by additional information. Reading or replying the story in its archived form does not constitute a re-publiccation of the story.
When commenting on a blog, or "tweeting" about a live event, do you find yourself saying things you wouldn't say to a person's face?
This came up when a loyal ToastedRav.com user passed along this article about an on stage interview at South x Southwest in Austin with the founder of Facebook.
Apparently the interviewer wasn't doing a very good job in the eyes of some audience members. A flood of texts and Twitters soon turned into a feeding frenzy of heckling. A sort of mob mentality appears to have ensued as described in the article:
""Never, ever have I seen such a train wreck of an interview," read one "tweet," as a post on Twitter is called.
The heckling soon migrated from the online space to the real world. Audience members started yelling out comments that reflected the online chatter. When the CEO suggested the interviewer might want to ask some questions, the audience erupted into cheers vigorous enough to surprise those not following the tweets."
In the same setting without the technology, I wonder how many in the audience would have been willing to walk up to the interviewer after the talk, look her in the eye, and say her work was "a train wreck." (Maybe it was, but that's not the point.)
This is something that's popping up more and more. When WIL radio conducted a "social experiment" trying to get two strangers to marry one another, the comment boards exploded vicious attacks on the contestants and other posters. Some of it was so obscene it had to be removed from the site.
The nastiness has extended to all sorts of posts by all sort of people on this site. It seems some folks can't intelligently disagree with a person. They have to resort to name-calling.
Blogs can go that route as well. This is not to say bloggers shouldn't voice their opinions loudly, or be critical when they think it's legitimate. But there is a way to do it in a respectful manner, like you would if you were having an "in person" conversation.
Hiding behind a nom de plume has become another habit in all these areas, further emboldening people to attack mercilessly without fear of repercussion.
All I'm saying here is we should have a little bit of a filter on what we say and how we say it in the cyber world. When talking to someone face to face, you're going to be a little more diplomatic, if for no other reason than the fear of being punched in the mouth. I wonder how many people in cyber-space might get a little nervous if their name and address were attached to everything they posted online.
- It rocks!
- Its just stupid.
- Its SPAM.
- Its offensive.
- Nevermind.
SandyShores (not my real name) 513 Days agoBlogs are like alcohol- they just magnify the true personality of the user. Odds are- if you don't like someone in a blog post, you wouldn't like them in person either. A jerk is still a jerk.
- It rocks!
- Its just stupid.
- Its SPAM.
- Its offensive.
- Nevermind.
George 513 Days ago- It rocks!
- Its just stupid.
- Its SPAM.
- Its offensive.
- Nevermind.
jp 513 Days agoIn all seriousness though, the mob mentality works both ways and anyone with any experience raising children knows that ignoring medium-temperature attention-seeking behavior when coupled with an environment of filled with exemplars of good behavior is the right answer for defining acceptable norms within a community. Norms are our real police.
The question, then, is how do we prevent norm-breaking behavior online from traversing into the physical space? Furthermore, at what point does all the norm-deconstruction that mass communication has helped along, stop being funny to those who understand the humor in deviance, and start being defining for a generation who is growing up with a vastly different frame of reference. Will we be able to explain the joke at that point?
I don't have any answers, but I sure enjoy asking the questions.
- It rocks!
- Its just stupid.
- Its SPAM.
- Its offensive.
- Nevermind.
Kristin! Staff 513 Days agoI think it's a similar phenomenon to the way people drive. Think about it: Do most people walk the way they drive? (Cutting people off, flipping people off, cursing at them, walking on someone's heels, etc.) Nope. Their car provides a comfortable bubble for them to drive around and be just as nasty as they want to others without much threat of retribution.
I know one thing for sure: Flaming on blogs and other posts is really ugly and unnecessary.
- It rocks!
- Its just stupid.
- Its SPAM.
- Its offensive.
- Nevermind.
Skip 513 Days ago- It rocks!
- Its just stupid.
- Its SPAM.
- Its offensive.
- Nevermind.
Kristin! Staff 513 Days ago- It rocks!
- Its just stupid.
- Its SPAM.
- Its offensive.
- Nevermind.
Skip 513 Days agoOut of respect for decorum, however, I won’t delve into my own nom de plume (for those that know the full one). However, rest assured my alias is solely for entertainment purposes and in good fun.
- It rocks!
- Its just stupid.
- Its SPAM.
- Its offensive.
- Nevermind.
SandyShores 513 Days ago- It rocks!
- Its just stupid.
- Its SPAM.
- Its offensive.
- Nevermind.
jp 513 Days agoSometimes brutal honesty and laziness net the same results.
Also, you can't change your screenname. (Booo)
- It rocks!
- Its just stupid.
- Its SPAM.
- Its offensive.
- Nevermind.
Chris Staff 513 Days ago- It rocks!
- Its just stupid.
- Its SPAM.
- Its offensive.
- Nevermind.
cram 512 Days ago';.... blep>>,<< !!!!!
- It rocks!
- Its just stupid.
- Its SPAM.
- Its offensive.
- Nevermind.
Skip 513 Days agoIn a way, blogging is pure free speech. We are given the opportunity to say whatever is on our minds uninterrupted. As a result, that can be a Pandora’s box that just spews out. Everyone loves free speech but few enjoy actually listening to unlike minded people. Welcome to the new not so kinder, not so gentler world wide web.
Sure, I think from the comments above, it’s more about using your right to free speech respectfully and constructively. However, I pretty excited about what this mean down the road. Off the tip of my head, can you imagine a political debate tied in with a twitter global chat? Sure, I’ll listen to what Wulf Blitzer has to say, but also want to hear about what Americans like myself think. Not someone’s take on what we should think.
- It rocks!
- Its just stupid.
- Its SPAM.
- Its offensive.
- Nevermind.
jp 513 Days agoWhat we are left with is no different than a picture on Flickr or whatever. A snapshot of a moment (relatively speaking) that only exists for consumption, not participation. It's a huge shame because it really is a platform that could drive discourse on so many important and relevant topics.
Hopefully we are beginning to see the sun set on the stream-of-consiousness blogs and a re-emergence of accessible single topic specialty blogs, and micro-blogging, if it survives, can begin to fill the void left by the lack of body language on the internet, and help with the steering rather than the jeering.
- It rocks!
- Its just stupid.
- Its SPAM.
- Its offensive.
- Nevermind.
Skip 513 Days ago- It rocks!
- Its just stupid.
- Its SPAM.
- Its offensive.
- Nevermind.
Cram 512 Days ago- It rocks!
- Its just stupid.
- Its SPAM.
- Its offensive.
- Nevermind.
Jay 500 Days agoJay
What do you think?
We want to hear from you! Take five seconds to join ToastedRav.com or log in.